UK Biobank health data keeps ending up on GitHub

1 sources1 storiesFirst seen 4/23/2026Score34Mixed Progress

Single Source

Bigness

Coverage

Recency

Engagement

Velocity

Confidence

Clipability

Polarization

Claims

Contradictions

Breakthrough

Sentiment Mix

Positive0%

Neutral100%

Negative0%

Geography

EuropeNorth America

Expert Signals

Cynddl

author • 1 mention

Hacker News

source • 1 mention

AI-Generated Claims

Generated from linked receipts; click sources for full context.

I tracked 110 notices filed so far, targeting 197 code repositories by 170 developers across the world.The exposure of Biobank data on GitHub is the latest in a long series of governance challenges for UK Biobank.

Supported by 1 story

(My colleague and I have an editorial in the BMJ about this: http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/bmj.s660?ijkey=dEot4dJZGZGXe...).

Supported by 1 story

The latest is today, with information of all half a million members listed for sale on Alibaba.Looking at the takedown notices, we often see specific files being targeted rather than entire repositories (possibly to justify the copyright infringement as required for a takedown notice, not a copyright expert; although it is clear that they only use DMCA notices as a last resort, for GitHub users they cannot identify, and who were likely not given access in the first place).

Supported by 1 story

A quarter of the files are genetic/genomics.

Supported by 1 story